beta
Text
1. Of the Plaintiff’s lawsuit against Defendant C, the part exceeding the payment of the money indicated in the Disposition No. 2 and the Defendant B.
Reasons
Basic Facts
A apartment is composed of 15 units, 1,260 units, which are multi-family housing located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon.
The plaintiff is the council of occupants' representatives of A Apartment, the defendant B was the chairperson of the plaintiff, and the defendant C was the chairperson of the A Apartment Election Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "First Class").
1) On November 1, 2011, the first election of the Dong apartment No. 11 was held from November 22, 201 to November 23, 201, and where there are more than two candidates, the second election of the Dong apartment No. 11 was announced that the candidates who obtained majority of the valid votes should be elected from the same representative. 2) E and F were recruited as candidates for A apartment No. 14 Dong Dong No. 14, and 53 households, among the 14 Dong 60 households, participated in the voting.
(hereinafter the above 14 representative election was held. As a result, the election of this case was held 50 marks out of the total 53 marks, and the invalidation marks out of the total 53 marks, and the validity marks are 3 marks, and it was publicly announced on November 24, 201 that the Plaintiff obtained 24 marks and F was elected as the same representative on November 24, 201.
3) However, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the result of the foregoing ballot counting on November 29, 201, and requested perusal of the voting paper of the instant representative election. On December 5, 2011, the election commission of the instant case decided to peruse the voting paper and made a perusal of the voting paper on December 7, 2011. As a result, the Plaintiff was found to have obtained 26 marks and F obtained 24 marks from December 8, 2011 in the above valid vote table, and it was confirmed that the Plaintiff was 26 marks and F obtained 24 marks in the above valid vote table, and that the Plaintiff did not request correction announcement to E (E did not request correction announcement to Defendant C around December 16, 2011).
This case’s chairperson’s election chief executive officer 1.