1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the addition and the amended plaintiff's claim, shall be modified as follows:

1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is the same as the statement in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where "No. 1808 of the judgment of the court of first instance" is referred to as "No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance" as "No. 1408 of the judgment of the court of first instance."

2. Determination as to claims against Defendant B and C

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Defendant B deposited the lease deposit with the Plaintiff’s account at the time of entering into a lease agreement with respect to Nos. 1408 and 1914. Defendant C deposited the lease deposit with the Plaintiff’s account at the time of entering into the lease agreement with respect to No. 1403. Since the said Defendants deposited the lease deposit with the Plaintiff’s account at the time of entering into the lease agreement with respect to No. 1819 and 1202, the said Defendants could have known or known that G entrusted with the Plaintiff with the authority to enter into the lease agreement with the intent to abuse the right to represent the deposit, etc., and thus, the lease agreement No. 1819 and 1202 is not effective against the Plaintiff. B. 15, the said Defendants’ act of breach of trust, which received the said Defendants’ lease deposit with the Plaintiff as G account and caused damages equivalent to the said amount to the Plaintiff, the said Defendants’ owner’s duty to deliver the lease agreement to G and the Defendants’ 19292, respectively, the expiration of the lease agreement.

(b) abuse of authority; or