logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.05.25 2017노34
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (3 million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Circumstances favorable to the defendant are as follows.

The odometer is 500m and is relatively short.

The drinking value is not higher than 0.097%.

In order to support the defendant, there are the old mother in need of support and the birth parents of the disabled who are 45 years of age.

The defendant confessions the crime of this case and repents.

Circumstances unfavorable to the defendant are as follows:

In the case of the crime of this case, from the front of the 679-2 unclaimed apartment in the Eup/Myeon-gun, the place where the crime of this case was committed to the roads from the front of the 679-2 unclaimed apartment to the 64-1st road in the center of the voice Eup, the people move frequently and the vehicle parked is high risk of traffic accidents caused by drinking, due to a large number of vehicles parked.

On March 7, 2003, the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he was sentenced to imprisonment for one year due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (don March 24, 2003), a fine of one million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (d on July 22, 2004), a fine of three million won due to the same crime on July 22, 2004, and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (d on June 1, 2006).

In addition, considering the defendant's age, sex, career, environment, circumstances, and result of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments after the crime, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow