(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.06.12 2014고정1944

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.06.12 2014고정1944

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a member of the “D feet” as the “D feet” center in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

1. On September 18, 2014, at around 15:08, the Defendant: (a) committed an injury to the victim E, an employee of the victim E, who was aware of the fact that the specific program was revoked without prior notice, on the ground that the victim E, who was an employee, took an attitude that the Defendant was not able to take care of the Defendant; (b) taken the face of the victim E by her head; (c) taken the face of the victim E with her head; (d) taken the part of the victim E with her blue part; and (e) sealed the victim’s shoulder part with her shoulder, thereby causing approximately two weeks of injury to the victim.

2. At the same time as Paragraph 1, the Defendant interfered with the business by force, such as putting the above 1st and the second 2nd floor of the skin center, and putting a complaint that a specific program was revoked without prior notice, such as Paragraph 1, and 30 minutes of the complaint to the victim F and its employees, who is the braille, brought about the disturbance to the victim F and its employees, thereby obstructing the operation of the skin center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. An investigation report (Attachment, etc. of a medical certificate for injury);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the file Nos. 1 and 2 among one CD [Judgment on the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel] did not cause any assault or injury to the victim E, and that the defendant only resisted as a consumer and did not interfere with the operation of the skin center.

However, according to the evidence mentioned above, while the defendant was in the victim E with the victim E, the victim E "hyna" and the victim E "hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna hyna

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2020.01.30 2019노1466

-수원지방법원 2020.12.10 2020고정371

-서울북부지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고단2886

-의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.07.07 2016가단15863

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2019.07.18 2018고정382