The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for four years, for four years and six months and for a fine of 300,000 won.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact that the Defendants were economically difficult to commit the instant crime, and that the Defendants reflects the instant crime and repented, the respective sentences of the lower court against the Defendants (Defendant A: 5 years of imprisonment; Defendant B: 5 years of imprisonment with prison labor; and KRW 300,00 of fine) are too unreasonable.

B. In light of the contents of the prosecutor’s crime, the statutory penalty, the nature of the crime, and the frequency of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants is too uneasible.

2. Determination of the Defendants and the Prosecutor’s grounds of appeal are also examined.

피고인들이 술에 취한 부녀자들을 상대로 속칭 ‘퍽치기’ 범행수법으로 저지른 강도상해, 강도치상 및 특수강도의 범행은 그 범행이 매우 위험한 방법으로 이루어지는 점, 피고인들의 범행으로 인하여 피해자가 매우 중한 상해에 이를 수도 있는 점, 실제로 피고인들은 피해자 F에게 약 4주간의 치료를 요하는 뇌진탕 등의 상해를 가하였음에도 피해회복을 하지 않은 점, 피고인 A은 이 사건 강도상해 및 특수강도 범행을 직접 실행하였던 점, 피고인 B은 특수강도죄, 강도상해죄 등으로 여러 차례에 걸쳐 실형으로 처벌받았고, 성폭력범죄의처벌및피해자보호등에관한법률위반(주거침입강간등)죄 등으로 징역 1년 6월을 선고받아 2010. 10. 11.경 형의 집행을 종료한 후 그 누범기간 중에 이 사건 각 범행을 저지른 점 등에 비추어 보면, 피고인들은 그에 상응하는 처벌을 받음이 마땅하다.

However, the defendants are divided into and against the crime of this case. In this court, the defendants paid damages to the victim H and agreed that the victim H did not want the punishment of the defendants. Part of the defendants' damage to the crime of this case were temporarily returned to the victims, and the victim K and R were punished by the defendants.