Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Experience] On January 10, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on January 18, 2018 to a crime of violation of the Oil Pipeline Safety Control Act in the Daejeon District Court’s Support, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 18, 2018.

[Criminal facts] No person shall transfer or acquire a password, a user number registered in a financial institution or an electronic financial institution, or establish a pledge in using a cash card or cash card, which is a medium access to electronic financial transactions.

Nevertheless, on August 14, 2017, the Defendant is a “B enterprise” from a person who has no name.

If the head of the Tong sends a e-mail card to create a value-added tax, he/she shall receive a proposal and send it to the 60-4 million won every time he/she trades the e-mail card. On the same day, he/she shall send a e-mail card connected to the Saemaul Treasury Account (E) in the name of the defendant using the e-mail at the D office located in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu.

(v) was transferred.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A trading statement and a financial transaction statement;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Residents and inquiries about criminal history, and the application of a text of judgment under statutes of one copy;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 1 and Article 6 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which a fine is selected;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of transferring or lending an access medium under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not easy in light of the fact that the crime not only undermines the credibility of the safety and performance of electronic financial transactions, but also becomes a means to facilitate other crimes. The access medium provided by the Defendant is actually used for the crime, on the other hand, the Defendant confessions and reflects the crime of this case, and the Defendant does not have the same criminal history, and the judgment has already become final and conclusive.