logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.09.14 2018고단1450
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 15, 2010, the Defendant was punished by a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on November 15, 2010, and a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on August 30, 2013 and two times or more for a crime of driving a motor vehicle while under influence of alcohol.

On May 16, 2018, around 23:14, the Defendant driven BM5 car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.185% from the 610 underground parking lots of the village tower in Seongbuk-gu, Seonam-si, Sungnam-si to approximately 610 square meters from the above wallsan apartment 606 and the front 606 street.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report on the circumstances of the driver who is to take the driving, investigation report (report on the circumstances of the driver who is to take the driving), and report the results of regulating drinking driving

1. Previous convictions: The application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, each disposition, previous convictions and results confirmations, to reported statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act reflects the wrongness of the defendant, and the fact that there is no other criminal records other than the previous conviction, etc., shall be determined as ordered

arrow