(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.02.03 2015고단1820

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.02.03 2015고단1820

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in the front of Pyeongtaek-si Cro on October 17:40, 2015; (b) the Victim D (76 aged) returned home; and (c) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol; and (d) the Defendant was under the influence of a dry field of shot, swine pots; and (d) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol.

"Stop saws", which are dangerous objects in possession;

In order to prevent the victim's left part and the victim's left part to prevent this, the victim left part of the victim's hand and the number of days of treatment to be unknown to the victim was left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant used dangerous objects to inflict bodily injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing criteria shall not apply to the crime of this case where the sentencing criteria are not set.

2. In light of the contents of the instant crime committed by the sentence, the Defendant’s liability for the crime of this case is very heavy, but it appears that the Defendant committed the instant crime by drinking and contingently, the injury suffered by the victim is relatively minor, the victim is not subject to the punishment of the Defendant, the suspended sentence was imposed due to the violation of the Military Service Act in 1975, and there is no particular criminal history other than the suspended sentence imposed, and other various circumstances recorded in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family environment, etc., are considered as ordered by the disposition.

참조조문

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.04.04 2017고단1544

-청주지방법원 2016.02.03 2015고단1763

-대구지방법원 2017.09.28 2017고단3241

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.03.23 2015고단584

-의정부지방법원 2017.11.20 2017고단4234