Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not materially disadvantage the defendant's right of defense, the facts charged are partly revised according to the evidence and recognized as criminal facts.

The defendant is a person entitled to receive a basic living security under the National Basic Living Security Act who has received medical benefits, etc. from the State, and C and D shall be a public official in charge of duties, such as managing the entitlement in the welfare division of residents of the F Military Office in South Korea E.

On February 6, 2017, at around 17:20, the Defendant: (a) changed the contents of the provision of medical benefits to himself/herself within the welfare and office of the above resident; (b) laid up a book on which the content of the provision of medical benefits to him/her had C go beyond the floor by having C go beyond the upper part of the left head; and (c) continued to go beyond the floor.

D The side of the bridge was assaulted by walking the side of the bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties for the welfare administration of the public officials of the Gun office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of C, D, and G;

1. The legal statement of the witness H in part;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In full view of the following circumstances revealed through the above evidence, i.e., the Defendant’s assaulted C in the F Gun’s residents’ welfare and office, ii) the Defendant attempted to capture C and C (the F Gun’s residents’ welfare and public officials’ welfare and public officials’ c) to the G (the F Gun’s residents’ welfare and public officials’ c) (the public officials’ c) under the F Gun’s welfare and office as stated in its reasoning; and iii) the Defendant’s interest and public officials in the F Gun’s residents’ welfare and public officials’ desire to resist the F Gun’s residents’ welfare and public officials by sound even after the Defendant was interesting.