Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are simple mother and female, Defendant A is shot of the victim C (Woo, 57 years old), the victim D (Woo, 32 years old), and Defendant B is between victims and dead money.

1. On April 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 08:40 on April 16, 2017, at the church located in Jungcheon-si, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim C, who is the trial money of the Defendant, by gathering the Defendant’s son Furine, the victim’s grandchildren, arms, etc. from several times, and her arms, etc. on the right side and the left side, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), taken a dynamic image of the victim as a mobile phone on the same page as that set forth in paragraph (1), and carried the victim’s cell phone by hand and plucking the victim’s hand, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as plucking up and plucking up the right side, and plucking up the booming part of the victim, which requires treatment for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and D;

1. Statement D in the police interrogation protocol regarding the defendant B;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C or D;

1. The defense counsel in the judgment of each injury diagnosis letter argues that the Defendants did not inflict any injury on the victims at the time of the instant case, and that the Defendants only carried two arms of C in order to prevent the Defendants from causing any harm to F, and Defendant B only took a cell phone to prevent the photographing of video without the consent of D, and that the Defendants’ act constitutes a legitimate defense or legitimate act.

However, according to the evidence of this case, it is difficult to view the Defendants’ act as a reasonable act to defend unfair infringement in light of the method of crime, the situation before and after the crime, and the circumstances leading up to the crime.