The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant to the punishment (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below shows the attitude of opposing the defendant to recognize all of the crimes in this case. However, since it is difficult for the defendant to compensate the victim for the traffic accident if a vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance caused a traffic accident, he operated 84 vehicles in violation of traffic law without mandatory insurance. In light of the period and frequency of the crime, etc., the liability for the crime is not less easy in light of the period and frequency of the crime, there are several records of punishment for the same crime, and the court below determined the punishment considering the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the fact that there is no special change of circumstances that could reduce the punishment of the court below, and considering all the sentencing conditions of the case and arguments, it cannot be viewed that the punishment imposed by the court below is inappropriate and too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, Article 46(2) of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015)’s “Article 46(2) of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015)” shall be corrected to “Article 46(2)2 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015