logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고정2995
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person running a city bus B.

On March 24, 2013, the Defendant driven the above bus on the 17:35th day of 2013, and driven the four-lane road in front of the high-speed terminal in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seocho-gu, Seoul, with one-lane road from the Gu circulation section in the Gu distribution section of New Asia to the speed of 15km.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on the way to reduce the speed and check the front left well, and to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, if the driver neglected this and did not neglect that the vehicle driving signal was changed to the stop signal, he found the victim C (the 27 years of age) who was crossing the crosswalk from the right side to the left side in accordance with the Mad pedestrian signals, delayed detection of the victim C (the 27 years of age) and operated it to avoid this, but did not avoid it, and did not go to the right side of the bus, and did not go beyond the victim by shocking it.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer from the above occupational negligence in detail that requires treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to cut booms and video images;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow