Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
The crimes of Nos. 1-A, 2-A, 3-B, 3-C and 4 in the judgment of the defendant.
Reasons
1. The sentence of the court below against the defendant in summary of the grounds for appeal (the sentence of 1-A, 2-A, 3-2(a), 3-2(c), 3-2(b), 3-5(f), 2-2(b), 3-2(f), 8-2(a) of the suspended sentence of 2-2(a), 2-2(a) of the suspended sentence of 1-2(a), 2-2(a), 3-2(a) of the suspended sentence of
2. The court below recognized the defendant's crime of latema, deposited 30 million won in the court below for the victim, and deposited 3 million won in the court below for the victim, and the 1-A, 2-A, 3-A, 3-B, 3-C, and Ra as well as the crime of violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act which became final and conclusive. The defendant and the victim jointly operated the singing practice room in a relationship between the defendant and the victim and jointly operated the singing practice room. This part of the circumstances favorable to the defendant are recognized.
However, in the case of the crimes of No. 1-A, No. 2-A, No. 2-A, No. 3-2-2, 3-2, 3-2, 3-3, and Ra, the defendant acquired a large amount of money from the victim, received money on the pretext of solicitation, and used violence against the victim several times, and the crime is not very good, and the defendant has been punished several times for the same crime, and there is a history of being sentenced to suspended execution, and there is a history of having been sentenced to suspended execution. The crimes of No. 1-C, No. 2-2, No. 2-2, No. 3-2, No. 2-2, No. 3-2, No. 3-2, No.