logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(전주) 2015.04.23 2014나1725
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. The plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 4, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into a contract on behalf of the Plaintiff with the Forestry Cooperatives in the Forestry Association in the Forestry Office in the G-gun in the G-gun in the Jeonbuk-gun (the land was divided into KRW 17752 square meters in E forest land, KRW 10035 square meters in I forest land, KRW 6130 square meters in F forest), KRW 14380 in G forest, KRW 14380 in North Korean forest, and KRW 1348 square meters in the former North Korean forest, on behalf of the Plaintiff, on behalf of the Plaintiff, the Forestry Association in the Y-gun and the Y-gun in the Forestry Office in the performance of all the management affairs of the said forest from January 4, 2005 to January 3, 2015.

(hereinafter “instant consignment contract”). B.

On April 5, 2008, the Defendant completed the working design including the B forest owned by the Plaintiff and C forest land of 21322 square meters inherited from the Plaintiff’s attached J (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant D forest”) in the forest tending project area in 2008, and completed the working design for the same year.

5. 26. A contract for the implementation of a project for forest tending with a forestry cooperative in the forest room-gun was concluded, and a forestry cooperative in the forest room-gun shall have the same effect for the same year.

9. From 26. to 6.10.6.

C. On March 29, 2010, the Defendant completed the working design including the instant H forest land owned by the Plaintiff in a forest tending project area in 2010, and the same year.

4. 8. A contract for a project for forest tending with a forestry cooperative in the competent Si/Gun was concluded, and a forestry cooperative in the competent Si/Gun was established in the same year.

9. From 24. to 19.10.0, the project was implemented as above.

The Defendant’s implementation of the forest tending project (hereinafter “instant project”) as described in paragraphs (b) and (c) above is about 66 weeks, 66 weeks of pine trees, and 2,136 other miscellaneous trees. Trees cut from the instant H forest land are about 961 weeks, 536 weeks of pine trees, and 2,052 weeks of trees.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 6 evidence, Eul evidence 1, 2, 10 evidence, Eul evidence 1-1 to 5, Eul evidence 12, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion forest tending project implementer.

arrow