Text
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is attached Form 2.3.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Under a plan to develop the Fususususususususususususususususususususususususususususususussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussussuss wesussussussussuss wesussuss.
3) G forest land G 340 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).
(2) On April 23, 2013, after the land category was changed to “site”, the land category was divided into three: (a) on May 1, 2013; and (b) on May 1, 2013; (b) on site to be developed, the Defendant: (a) located in the instant permitted site and thought to be developed as a housing complex for electric source in the future; and (b) on the part of the owners in order to purchase the land of KRW 5,308 square meters and the land of KRW 486 square meters (hereinafter collectively referred to as “land to be developed”); (b) on the part of the owners for the convenience of development after the purchase, the Defendant divided the land into KRW 5,300,000 and KRW 308,000,000, KRW 605,000 and KRW 75,000,000, KRW 75,000 and KRW 75,000, forest and field, and field 75, forest and field 75, forest and field.
2) On May 8, 2012, the Defendant purchased L’s land before subdivision from Q and R from the prospective development site on May 8, 2012. On March 29, 2013, the Defendant purchased the remainder of M’s land before subdivision from S and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of each themselves and each wife (“1/2 shares”).
B. B. Before the conclusion of the instant sales contract, the Defendant set up six detached houses with the second floor in the instant permitted site, the disputed land, and the N land around March 201.