Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On July 18, 2012, at around 10:00, the Defendant alleged that the victim C, who is the head of the Dong, had made a false statement several times at the place where approximately 15 residents of the village, for the purpose of holding the village conference in front of the village community hall B in the Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, Kim Jong-gun, the Defendant openly insulting the victim by the sound “the head of the Dong of the Dong of Gyeyang-gun.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the statutes on each of the statements in C and D to the suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Selection of Punishment for the Crime. Article 311 (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The Defendant alleged that, around 10:00 on July 18, 2012, at around 10:10, the victim C, who was the head of the Dong, had approximately 15 residents of the village, made a false statement on several occasions in order to hold the village conference in front of the village hall in Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, Kim Jong-gun, the Defendant openly insulting the victim by the sound of “the victim is the head of Dong.”

2. In light of the judgment, there was a statement of C and E as evidence consistent with the facts charged, but they experienced conflict with the Defendant in relation to the location of the village development fund that is scheduled to be paid to the Gyeong-gun in Korea at the same time, and around July 9, 2012, immediately before the occurrence of the instant case, E filed a criminal complaint against the Defendant as a crime of insulting the Defendant’s wife, and the Defendant filed a criminal complaint against E as a crime of insult, and there is not any other evidence submitted by the prosecution alone to the effect that the Defendant insult C as stated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently.

3. According to the conclusion, this part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant should be acquitted under Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.