logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.06.13 2014고단859
도로교통법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Around 03:55 on February 21, 2014, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of a DNA freight vehicle, was driving the said freight vehicle from the steering distance of the female intersection located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and proceeded along three-lanes on the 5-lane road from the view of the view of the view of the city from the view of the view of the city to the view of the city, while making the left-hand turn to the the left at the view of the city, by negligence, who did not notify in advance the change of the two-lane to the direction, etc., and caused the Defendant to damage the fenz E20 vehicle driving from the view of the view of the city from the view of the city to the view of the city, to the left-hand left-hand part from the front gate of the said freight vehicle to the front 15,202,546 won, such as the repair cost for the front gate.

2. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent pursuant to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim G corporation, the owner of Fenz E20 vehicle, expressed his/her intent not to prosecute the defendant on June 2, 2014, after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow