logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.02.16 2016고단2469 (1)
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the D building at Jeju city where C is located.

On March 2, 2015, the Defendant leased the foregoing building 10,200,000 won annually to E to operate a massage place. On August 2, 2016, the Defendant provided a place for sexual traffic by continuously leasing the said building to E from around the time to October 6, 2016, upon being notified by the Jeju Local Police Agency that the said building was provided to sexual traffic places.

Accordingly, the defendant committed acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of suspect interrogation of E (2/28 pages of investigation records);

1. A real estate lease agreement;

1. The application of a statute of notice on May 5, 2016

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after committing the crime, both criminal cases, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant argument, should be taken into account. In particular, the following circumstances should be taken into account: (a) the Defendant, the lessee, was under control when engaging in commercial sex acts for a long time at the instant establishment; and (b) the Defendant, who was notified by the police twice, did not make all efforts to stop providing a building while continuously leasing the instant establishment to E, even if he was notified of the fact that the Defendant was under control by the police twice.

A. The favorable circumstances: The defendant recognized the crime of this case, and there is no record of other crimes as well as the punishment of fines for the crime of this case before the crime of this case is committed.

arrow