All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant repeatedly committed the instant crime even if he/she had the same criminal record in several times, and that the Defendant did not agree with the victim D and E up to the trial of the party, strict punishment against the Defendant is necessary.

However, considering the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate, and is too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and the prosecutor's above assertion are without merit, since the defendant's and the prosecutor's allegation are all without merit. In light of the defendant's age, sexual behavior and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.