(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.04.01 2014고단4777

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.04.01 2014고단4777

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving of a taxi for business use B.

On October 22, 2014, at around 04:15, the Defendant: (a) was an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed to turn to the left from the front side of the full-time elementary school to the left in accordance with a one-lane turn from the front side of the gold zone; (b) thus, the Defendant: (c) was injured by the victim C (40 years old) who was crossing pursuant to the instant taxi due to the negligence in violation of the signal while checking whether there was a person who gets on the way by reducing speed and properly examining the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver; and (d) neglected his duty of care to safely drive pursuant to the new subparagraph; and (e) neglected his/her duty of care to safely drive pursuant to the new subparagraph; and (e) caused the victim’s injury, such as the cutting down, closing, etc. of the left part of the 7 weeks left part of the said taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C's statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. The actual condition survey report and signal system map;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the detention in the workhouses does not include the result of the victim’s injury due to the traffic accident in this case. However, the victim’s injury is not small, the defendant is admitted to the Financial Cooperative, the defendant is divided, and the defendant has reached an agreement with the victim, and the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, etc.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.09.24 2015고단924

-대구지방법원 의성지원 2019.11.07 2019고단269

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2013.06.20 2012고단3393

-서울북부지방법원 2019.11.21 2019고단3407

-부산지방법원 2013.05.29 2012고단10352