The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the substance of the grounds for appeal of this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (one year and two months of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the defendant's mistake is deeply divided, the crime of this case is likely to inhale hallucinogenic substances in the park, which is offered for the general public's passage, and there is a need to strictly control them as there is a danger that they will proceed to other crimes in the state of exchange, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was punished for the same kind of crime, even though he was during the period of repeated crime, and there is a need to isolate the defendant in the state of dependence on hallucinogenic substances for a certain period from harmful environments. In full view of the above circumstances, the court below held that the defendant was sentenced to punishment in consideration of the above circumstances, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, it cannot be viewed that the defendant's punishment against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.