A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 5, 2014, at around 23:50, the Defendant filed a report in 112 on the following facts: (a) Changwon-si Btel 406, Changwon-si Btel 112.

The Defendant continued to talk with the police officer D and guard E, who is a police officer belonging to the Mapo-dong Police Station C police station, called the Defendant, who received the above report and called the Defendant to go to the police box, stating that he will not disclose his personal information,” and continued to go to the police box.

Around 00:05 the following day, the Defendant: (a) stated that “I son’s son son son son son son son son son her son her son her son her son her imprisonment with prison labor and her her son her her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her her son her son her her son her son her son her son her son her son her son her son she was not returned to the former her her son her son her her son her son her son her her son her her son her son she was not returned to the former her her son, and the Defendant continued to provide her her son and her her son her son her her to solve her her.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order [the scope of recommendations] obstruction of performance of official duties.