A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2015, around 01:15, at the front of the D Hospital located in Yansan-gu, Jeonju-si, the Defendant: (a) emitted a sign "in the process of drinking alcohol control," which was set up in the central line to control drinking while drinking alcohol; (b) stated that the victim's slopeF (34 years of age) belonging to the Jeonju Police Station E in the Jeonjunan Police Station would put the victim's slopeF (34 years of age) into our house." However, when the victim refused drinking control while drinking control, the Defendant rejected the victim as a taxi; (c) said, "this spons, spons, spons, spons, and spons, spons, spons." At the same time, the Defendant assaulted the victim's head by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on drinking control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the "justifiable circumstances") of the suspended sentence;

1. From one month to five years of the applicable sentences in law; and

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended sentence] and the basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the obstruction of performance of official duties) (the scope of the recommended sentence].

3. Determination of sentence: (a) the nature of the crime of this case and the circumstances of the crime are not good; (b) the defendant was sentenced to a fine of 5 million won on January 25, 2006 due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of measurement); and (c) the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence on November 20, 2008 due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of measurement); and (d) there are many other unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that there was a history of punishment on several occasions.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided in depth, there is no record that the defendant has been punished for obstruction of performance of official duties, and the defendant undergoes the surgery of the ambrat around 2014.