logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.04.07 2015고단4142
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a C Poter cargo vehicle.

On October 13, 2015, the Defendant driving the Do Chang-distance Intersection in the Do Chang-dong, which is located in the Do Chang-dong, at the time of the Gyeonggi-do, at around 20:00 on October 13, 2015, led the Defendant to directly drive the said cargo at the Do Chang-dong at the speed of about 60km from the Do Chang-dong

In such a case, since the signal at that time is installed, in such a case, the driver of the vehicle was negligent in performing the duty of care to reduce the speed of the driver of the vehicle and safely proceed pursuant to the new code, and the defendant was given the front part of the victim D, who crosses the crosswalk from the right side of the defendant's proceeding to the left-hand side, in accordance with the victim D, who crosses the crosswalk from the right side of the road to the left-hand side, in accordance with the victim D's 50c-free ttt tt t t t t t t kb

Thus, the defendant suffered injury, such as the crossing of the third main stream, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Standard for sentencing [Scope of recommended punishment] The basic area (from April to October) (the person who is subject to special sentencing) of the type 1 of ordinary traffic accidents; and

2. The sentencing decision defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, the vehicle of the defendant is expected to help the victim recover from damage caused by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime. However, the sentencing factors favorable to the defendant are the sentencing factors that are favorable to the defendant, such as violating the signal signal at the time when the defendant passed the crosswalk, and the damage to the victim is relatively heavy.

arrow