Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On March 30, 2011, the Defendant, at the office of Daegu Northern-gu B Company, sealed a rubber letter stating registration number C, trade name “C,” “D Company”, and name “E” in the column of the supplier of the tax invoice for the purpose of exercising, and forged one sheet of tax invoice, which is a document pertaining to the rights and obligations and certification of facts in the name of D Company E, by stating on the column of the recipient and the column of supply value.

B. At the same time as in the preceding paragraph, rubbers, such as the foregoing, affixed a list of transactions and forged one sheet of transaction, which is a document pertaining to the rights and obligations and certificates of fact in the name of D Company E, by stating the total amount, items, etc. in the transaction list.

2. Around April 16, 2011, the Defendant used one tax invoice in the name of a forged D company and one transaction statement by facsimile to the complainant F, who is aware of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of tax invoices and copies of trade lists;

1. Articles 231, 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act competition among the crimes of uttering of a falsified investigative document;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;