1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to the defendant A 26,889,231 won and 26,580,344 won among them:

B. Defendant B and C are deceased.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 5, 2004, the Plaintiff filed a claim for reimbursement against Defendant A and deceased D by Seoul Central District Court Decision 2004Da153576, and rendered a judgment on October 5, 2004 that “Defendant A and deceased D shall jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff KRW 26,889,231 and KRW 26,580,344 per annum from March 8, 2004 to August 4, 2004, and KRW 20% per annum from August 5, 2004 to the day of full payment.”

B. The deceased on July 6, 2014, Defendant A, his spouse, and Defendant B and C inherited 3/7 shares, and 2/7 shares, respectively. On October 6, 2014, the Defendants reported to the Seoul Family Court 2014Ra9491, and the said court accepted the said report on November 27, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2 evidence, Eul 1 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the allegations and the above facts of recognition, the lawsuit in this case is recognized as a re-litigation for the extension of extinctive prescription, and the plaintiff (1) as to the plaintiff's 26,889,231 won and 26,580,344 won among them, and (2) defendant B and C are jointly and severally with the defendant Gap within the scope of the property inherited from the network D.

Of the money stated in paragraph (1), 7,682,637 won (=26,89,231 won x 2/7), and 7,594,384 won (=26,580,344 won x 2/7) from March 8, 2004 to August 4, 2004, each of which is equivalent to one’s own shares in inheritance 2/7, shall be liable to pay the money calculated at each rate of 18% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case is with merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.