All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the grounds for appeal by Defendant D

A. Article 111 of the former Attorney Park Jae-young (amended by Act No. 8321, Mar. 29, 2007; hereinafter the same applies) of the Act on the first ground of appeal refers to the case in which a public official receives money or goods under the pretext of soliciting or arranging the case or affairs handled by a public official. It does not include the case where a public official simply provides labor or convenience in connection with the case or affairs handled by a public official, and receives money or goods in consideration thereof. However, it does not include the case where a public official simply provides labor or convenience in favor of a public official in connection with the case or affairs handled by a public official and receives money or goods in consideration of the nature of labor or affairs handled by a public official in an indivisible manner in consideration of the nature of the case or affairs handled by the public official, and where the money or goods are received by a public official in consideration of the nature of the above affairs conducted by the public official in consideration of the acquisition of a new work or affairs conducted by a new public official in consideration of the acquisition of a license (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do3044, Apr. 10, 20, 2000).