logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.06.14 2018고정422
특정범죄자에대한보호관찰및전자장치부착등에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On May 30, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Criminal Offenders and the Electronic Monitoring, etc. at the Daejeon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 8, 2018.

[2] The Defendant was sentenced to 10 years of imprisonment at the Changwon District Court on April 8, 2005 and completed the execution of the sentence on December 8, 2014. On August 25, 2014, the Defendant was under the protection and observation of the attachment of an electronic device on the ground of the above facts in Busan District Court’s location tracking device attachment 7 years on August 25, 2014, and the Daejeon District Court’s special rules on June 17, 2017 from 00:00 to 05:00 each day, and 0.05% of alcohol level during blood transfusion.

Although the Defendant faithfully implements Article 9-2 (Matters to be Observed) of the Act on the Protection and Observation, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders and Article 32 (Matters to be Observed) of the Act on the Electronic Monitoring, etc., the Defendant may:

A. (1) From 00:00 to 00:11 on July 22, 2017, 11 minutes, from 00:0 to 0:04 on August 1, 2017, 4 minutes, from 00:0 to 00:04 on August 1, 2017, from 00 to 00:14 minutes on August 15, 2017, from 00:0 to 00:14, from 00:16 on August 26, 2017, in violation of an order to restrict outing four times in total, by going out during the hours of the order to prohibit outing outing to 0:0 to 01:11.

2) On August 22, 2017, around 22:40, at around 664, 27:103, Hanma-dong apartment 103, the next Gama-dong apartment 103, the male and female on his name in the name and drinking, and then, the disputing party was at the price of the so-called so-called so-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-young-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and attempted to measure alcohol after detection by the Daejeon-gu observation team for prompt response to the hospital treatment. However, it violated the drinking prohibition order

3) On August 26, 2017, around 00:50, around 00:50, around 664-h 27, Hanma-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, 103, the Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, had attempted to verify drinking facts and to measure drinking, but violated a drinking prohibition order, such as failing to measure by refusal of measurement.

(b) the observation of protection;

arrow