Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is that the defendant occupies and manages the land of this case as a road, and that of this case, "the defendant occupies and manages the land of this case, 7)" and "the 5th to the 7th 8th th th th th 8th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th
(2) In light of the above legal principles, the land of this case was used as a lawsuit connected to a major road from the Japanese colonial point point of view, ② The land cadastre for the first partition of this case was lost due to the Korean War on December 20, 1959, and was restored to the owner’s disturbance on March 28, 197, ③ The Minister of Construction and Transportation announced AW of March 28, 197, in relation to AX Urban Planning Area.