Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 11 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 17, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 by the Suwon District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On June 22, 2020, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with 0.184% of blood alcohol concentration around 23:25 on June 22, 2020, and was driving a DNA car at a section of about 800 meters from the parking lot for the public service center in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the front of the C apartment.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. A written request for appraisal;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment of the same criminal records and a copy of the summary order), and application of one copy of the summary order;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant repeated a crime despite the fact that the defendant had been punished once due to drunk driving, and that the blood alcohol concentration is very high, etc., under the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, while the defendant recognizes the crime and is against the truth, the defendant does not have any traffic accident, the criminal record of the above drinking driving is a fine, the criminal record of the above drinking driving is a criminal record, and there is no other criminal record, and the fact that the person desires to take the defendant's preference, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and taking into account all other conditions of the sentencing specified in the records of this case as ordered.