1. The part of the plaintiff A's claim in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.

The name of the representative of the defendant is from the plaintiff B to E.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation on this part of the Plaintiff B’s claim is that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part of the Plaintiff A’s claim on February 2, 201

A. Basic facts 1) The Defendant, as a temple in Jeju City F, was in charge of each of its executive officers, the well-known E, G, H, I, J, Plaintiff A, and K. An incorporated association, at the Jeju City L, has its principal office and was established for the purpose of the Buddhist E, G, M, H, H, and N, respectively. (2) The Defendant’s meeting minutes of the board of directors on February 19, 2012 (13:30 minutes of the Plaintiff’s meeting (13:30%) stated in the separate sheet that the Plaintiff again selected the representative as the Defendant’s representative to correct each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”). It stated that the resolution was approved that the Plaintiff again attended the meeting, E, H, I, J, and K to appoint the representative as the full-time representative of the participants.

In addition, the defendant's meeting minutes of the board of directors dated February 19, 2012 (14:50 minutes of the board of directors), stating that the defendant's each of the instant real estate, owned by the defendant, shall be donated to D, which is an incorporated association, shall be subject to a resolution (other than the representative, the defendant shall be deemed not to clearly distinguish between the directors and other officers; hereinafter the defendant's representative and executives shall be referred to as "board of directors", and the above two resolutions shall be referred to as "each resolution of the instant case's board of directors").

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The defendant's summary of the first party's assertion on the defense prior to the merits is legitimate after the resolution of each case's resolution of ratification.