The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant was to cooperate in the investigation of narcotics.

However, for about 18 years and 9 months, the Defendant sold a lot of 16-hours, and was punished three times in total, including that the Defendant was punished three times by committing the same kind of crime, by selling a large amount of merptes over 16 times.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of crime, and consequences as shown in the records and pleadings, all of the sentencing conditions in the instant case, such as the circumstances after the commission of crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is only within the reasonable scope of discretion, and it is difficult to view it as unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.