logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.10.27 2016가단18880
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver each real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From February 26, 2016, the above-mentioned A

(b).

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on January 25, 2015 with regard to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by the plaintiff (hereinafter "the real estate of this case"), with regard to deposit money of KRW 3,900,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,200,000, and the lease agreement of this case from January 25, 2015 to January 25, 2017 (hereinafter "the lease agreement of this case") and delivered the real estate of this case to the defendant. The lease contract of this case contains the following facts: The lease agreement of this case is terminated if the tenant fails to pay the rent of this case to the plaintiff at the second period. It is evident that the defendant did not pay the rent to the plaintiff from February 26, 2016 to the present date, and it was clear that the copy of the complaint of this case was terminated on the ground that the lease agreement of this case was terminated by the defendant 26.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and pay the Plaintiff a rent of KRW 1,200,000 per month from February 26, 2016 to the time of delivery of the instant real estate, or unjust enrichment equivalent to rent of KRW 1,20,00.

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow