beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., escapeing vehicle), violation of the Road Traffic Act, and violation of the Road Traffic Act (ii).
On December 25, 2014, at around 06:08, the Defendant, around 06:08, had the four streets in front of the restaurant “E” located in P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P, P,
Since there are places where traffic control is not supported, it is necessary to verify whether a person engaged in driving service is a vehicle crossing by reducing the speed or temporarily stopping the vehicle, and if there is another vehicle entering the intersection, it is necessary to yield the course to the other vehicle, and if there is another vehicle to enter the intersection from a road with a width wider than the road where the vehicle of the defendant is passing through the intersection, it is necessary to yield the course to the other vehicle, and if the vehicle of the defendant is to enter the intersection at the same time, there is a duty of care to prevent the accident by driving by yielding the way to the right road in advance.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded as the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s car, which is the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s car, and advanced from the right side of the road where the Defendant’s driver’s car passes to the above four distance, and received the front part of the Victim G(56)’s car driving from the F community service center to the same domination.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of treatment for about three weeks by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the injured party while destroying and damaging the car at the market price of KRW 1.5 million.
2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act for the said car owner’s own interest.