beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The facts charged [the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint residence) by Defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, and BV among the 2013 senior group9] around 18:40 on June 28, 2012, the Defendants attempted to install a temporary stage to hold a night cultural task at the entrance of the H project team located in Seopo-si G on the part of Seopopo-si, and informed the project team of the complaint about the situation of vehicle traffic problems, etc. at around 19:0 on the same day. On the same day, the Defendants were dissatisfied with the complaint about the temporary stage to hold a night cultural task at the entrance of the H project team located in Seopo-si, and Defendant A, X, X, Y, QF, BG, B, U, T, O, B, B, B, A, and S, and called a joint officer of the project team at the entrance of the project team or at the entrance of the project team “14:0 on the same day,” and became a joint officer of the project team.
2. Determination
A. In the crime of intrusion upon residence, the “building”, which is the object of the crime of intrusion upon residence, includes the summary of the building itself and its accessory in a strict sense in light of the fact that the crime of intrusion upon residence is practically a legal interest protected by the law.
In this context, the above summary should be clearly revealed that the land adjacent to the structure is installed at the boundary of the outside and provided for the use of the structure, and it is objectively evident that the outside can not have access without permission, because it is installed at the boundary of the outside.
(See Supreme Court Decision 2009Do14643 Decided April 29, 2010). B.
First of all, among the evidence submitted as to this part of the facts charged, we examine the admissibility of photographs, hard-fagics, hard-fagics and hard-fagics (hereinafter collectively referred to as "each photograph"), and documentary evidence storage cd (hereinafter referred to as "sadics").
Each photograph is the content of a video file stored in the visual field, in which a police officer finds that the screen is cut or recorded while viewing by reproducing the video file stored in the visual field, and which actually serves as evidence.
(e).