logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.13 2015고정1304
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 23, 2011, the Defendant stated that “In the front of the Jung-gu Seoul metropolitan building and the C building, the Defendant brought the victim D with the condition that “In the process of the demolition of the demolition of the building and the C building, the removal of the building is underway, brought the ground sections of the said two buildings such as the steel, the steel, the non-ferrous, the waste cable, etc., the underground electricity rooms of the E building and the scrap iron of the mechanical room, etc., and changed the price of KRW 130 million.”

However, the defendant only purchased the scrap metal of the ground level of the building, and there was no fact that he purchased the steel of the underground department, the mechanical room, etc. of the building, and even if he received the said money, he did not have the ability to supply the victim with the underground department, the mechanical room, etc.

The Defendant, as a result of the victim’s purchase price, is KRW 5 million on March 22, 2011; KRW 60 million on March 23, 201; and KRW 23,000,000 on March 23, 201; and

4.1.1. A total of KRW 130 million was remitted, including KRW 65 million.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received approximately KRW 40,000,000 from the price equivalent to the steel of the underground department of the building, the mechanical room, etc.

2. On April 201, 201, the Defendant stated that “On-the-spot removal pipes are not strong, and if the owner of the building does not know about KRW 30 million, the Defendant would not remove the scrap metal, etc.” to the first police officer, and the Defendant would not add the price of KRW 30 million to that amount.”

However, there was no fact that the removal pipe F requested the removal pipe F to increase the removal pipe's KRW 10 million on the ground that the removal pipe was dong, and there was no request to change the removal pipe's KRW 30 million.

On April 7, 2011, the Defendant: (a) on April 7, 201, from the victim, the Defendant: (b) KRW 10 million in the pipe board of the building demolished to the Defendant’s passbook

4.9. The same name has received a total of KRW 30 million, including KRW 20 million.

As a result, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 20 million won of the difference in the pipeline price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution (including the D substitute part);

1. G. G.

arrow