A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 20, 2019, the Defendant: (a) discovered the Victim B’s Switzerland car parked on the 43-2 street south-ro 6-2 street in Seongbuk-gu, Manam-si, Sungnam-si on January 20, 2019; and (b) destroyed the said vehicle’s beams and strings to the extent that the amount of the repair cost is influored by fluoring and fluoring the parts of the said vehicle’s beam and strings.

2. On February 6, 2019, the Defendant: (a) discovered the G rocketing car owned by the victim D that was parked on the street in front of the “F located in Seongbuk-gu E” located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si on February 6, 2019; and (b) destroyed the said part of the driver’s seat and the front door of the said car to the extent that the amount of the repair cost would be influenced by defrating, and without any reason, without any reason.

3. On February 6, 2019, the Defendant: (a) discovered an IK3 car owned by the victim H that was parked at the time and place specified in paragraph (2); and (b) destroyed the part of the chief sentence sentence of the said car to a flick tool without any justifiable reason so that the amount of the repair cost is inflicked by flicking it.

4. On February 6, 2019, the Defendant: (a) found the date and time set forth in paragraph 2; and (b) destroyed the damaged part of the said car to the extent that the amount of the repair cost in a flash with the victim J, which was parked in the place, and without any reason, destroyed by a flashing tool with the top door of the said car as a flashing tool.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of B, D, H, and J;

1. Data on the spot and damaged photographs;

1. Application of the CCTV image data to a photographic Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is recognized that the defendant's mistake in sentencing is recognized among concurrent offenders as well as the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.

However, in 2014, the Defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual destruction, damage, etc.) by destroying and damaging a vehicle of many unspecified victims at least 40 times.