The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable because the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

2. In the first instance of the judgment, the circumstances in which the Defendant was aware of all of the crimes, and against the Defendant.

However, since the so-called “Sishing” crime in which the Defendant participated is serious harm to the society, there is a need to strictly punish the persons involved in the crime, and in light of the frequency of the crime, etc., the nature of the crime and the degree of the crime are not good, and there is no special change in circumstances that can determine the punishment differently from the original judgment.

In addition, considering the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, health status, previous convictions, and circumstances after the instant crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that there is no ground for appeal, [Provided, That the provisions of Article 347(1), Article 30 (1), and Article 352, Article 347(1), and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (each attempted fraud), Article 37 subparag. 10 of the Resident Registration Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the illegal use of the resident registration number of each other), and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the illegal use of the resident registration number of each other), and each decision of imprisonment is to be added to “the applicable provisions of the Act and the choice of punishment” in the column for “application of the law of 1.0” of the judgment of the court below.