1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation on this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the pertinent part, except that the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance include "(based on recognition] Nos. 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 28, 29, 47 evidence No. 1, 3, 5, 5, 10, 29, 29, 47 evidence No. 2, 10 and 13 evidence No. 1, and Eul's whole purport of pleading No. 13, 420 of the Civil Procedure Act."

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff, from April 2, 200 to March 7, 2002, neglected to perform his/her duties, neglected to perform his/her duties, thereby causing false disclosure of company information, false entry of company stocks, financial statements ( quarterly reports), lack of accounting data, or destruction or loss, and thereby the transaction of stocks issued by the defendant company is suspended and listing is abolished. As such, the defendants, pursuant to Articles 401, 389(3) and 210 of the Commercial Act, jointly and severally, assert 860 won per share with respect to 11,00 shares of the defendant company owned by the plaintiff (11,00 won per share of the defendant company held by the plaintiff around March 7, 200, 90 won with the lowest price of 90 won per share and 208 won per share from July 9, 2002, 200 to July 30, 2008, 2008 won with the difference between the minimum price of 300 won and 208 won per share price per 5.6808 billion won.

The stock price of the company issued by the company is higher than the normal stock price by preventing the deterioration of the financial structure of the company from being known to the securities market due to bad faith or gross negligence by the director of the company.