logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.20 2015가합566434
정정보도 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a member of the National Assembly of the 19th National Assembly, who belongs to the C Party, and the Defendant is a newspaper enterpriser who issues the Central Daybook as a daily newspaper.

B. In the inspection site of the state administration of the D Ministry of National Defense, the Plaintiff mentioned the ECOM F, its telegraphic carrier G Center, etc., while asking questions to the Minister of National Defense, and the Defendant posted an article in attached Form 2 (hereinafter “instant report”) written by the reporter of the Defendant, under the title “I,” on the five pages of HH Central Daily 5.

C. On September 13, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the report of this case did not contain any divulgence of military secrets at the inspection site of the State administration, and that the report of this case was requested by the Defendant’s correction report and apology.

The Defendant posted a private opinion in attached Form 3, which points out the problems of the National Assembly members revealed in the inspection of state administration on the JJ Central 34 pages, and to the same effect as the instant report, included the contents of the Plaintiff’s disclosure of military secrets.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including virtual number), entry of Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion did not reveal military secrets at the inspection place of the State administration by the Ministry of National Defense, the Defendant reported clearly against objective truth through the instant report, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s honor.

Therefore, pursuant to Article 14 of the Act on Press Arbitration and Remedies, etc. for Damage Caused by Press Reports (hereinafter “ Press Arbitration Act”), the Defendant shall make a corrective report with the same content as the corrective report stated in attached Table 1 on the instant report (if the obligation to make a corrective report is not fulfilled, the Defendant shall also make a claim for compensation to enforce the obligation to make a corrective report). As such, the Defendant has damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation by making a false report as above, and thus,

arrow