All parts of the judgment of the court below against Defendant A and E shall be reversed.

Defendant

A, Defendant, and Defendant, respectively, shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and two months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment of Defendant A (the first instance court: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year and 2 years: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year) is excessively unreasonable.

B. Defendant AE’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is excessively unreasonable.

C. The second instance court’s punishment against Defendant A of the public prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court of the court of the first and second instance ex officio on the judgment of the court of the court below, and the prosecutor filed an appeal against the judgment of the court of the court of the court of the court of the court of the first and second instances, and the court of the court of the court of the second instance decided to concurrently examine the two appeals cases. The crimes of the court of the court of the court of the first and second instances are concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and should be sentenced to a single sentence within the scope of punishment aggravated for concurrent crimes pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. In this regard, the judgment of the court of the court

3. Determination on the grounds for appeal by Defendant AE

A. It is recognized that the crime of this case is committed against many and unspecified persons with great social harm and is planned and intelligent so it is highly necessary to eradicate because the nature of the crime is not good. Defendant AE performs the role of soliciting the passbook to be used for the crime and withdrawing the money deposited in the above passbook, and the degree of participation cannot be deemed minor.

However, considering all the circumstances, such as the fact that Defendant AE has no particular criminal record except for the two-time criminal records and two-time criminal records, the fact that Defendant AE is detained for nine months, the support of Defendant AE’s family, the victim AO, BY, and AR, and the motive, means and method of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the degree of participation, and the profits actually acquired, the sentence of the lower court is somewhat unreasonable.

B. Therefore, Defendant AE’s assertion is with merit.

4. Conclusion, among the judgment below.