logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.11 2014고단1182
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has operated a mutual name called “D” and “E” in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C.

At around 209, the Defendant operated a small music camera with the trade name of “F” in the vicinity of the Defendant’s shop, supported the disabled male ties, provided care to the husband who is administering the horse cancer, provided care to the husband who is in difficult to care for the husband, paid a large amount of money at the hospital expense. As a result, the victim G (the age of 44, female) who was making it difficult to care for the husband who is administering the horse cancer, was subject to serious economic difficulties by boosting the amount equivalent to KRW 30 million as a stock investment. As such, the Defendant provided legal advice to the victim during the criminal complaint process against the said fraud case, and led the victim to the close with the victim.

Since the beginning of the year of 2010, the Defendant borrowed a small amount of money from the victim on several occasions for operating expenses such as the head office, etc., which led to the aggravation of operating conditions such as the head office, and caused financial difficulties.

On May 14, 2010, the Defendant issued a debit card from the victim who believed to be true on the same day and withdrawn 500,000 won in cash in the name of loan, even if the victim borrowed money from another person without any money existing, the interest shall be paid later without the mold, and the father succeeded to the land located in Yongsan H and in the south Sea, but the collateral is not likely to be set up on the above land in the future.” On the same day, the Defendant directly withdrawn 50,000 won in cash under the pretext of loan by borrowing it from the victim.

However, the Defendant had been in arrears with the amount of tax equivalent to KRW 100 million imposed by operating the debentures company, etc. at the time of the cumulative management of the above head office and head office before several years, as well as the loans and amount of tax equivalent to KRW 100 million from financial institutions.

arrow