1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

2. The seizure of articles 1 and 2 shall be confiscated;

3. The defendant 102.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. Around 22:00 on April 17, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (mariju) (hereinafter referred to as “mariju”) smoked by inserting the first tobacco smoke of one on the spot at the D Hospital parking lot located in Yangyang-si C, and then inserting approximately 0.3g of marijuana into the spot and attaching a fire to the smoke.

2. Violation of the Narcotics Control Act;

A. At around 02:00 on April 18, 2014, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs (hereinafter “copon”). Around 02:00, the Defendant administered Mecopon (hereinafter “copon”).

B. On April 21, 2014, at around 11:25, the Defendant: (a) carried approximately 1.17 g of phiphones by dividing them into two in a single-use injection machine; and (b) carried them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written request for appraisal and an additional written request for appraisal;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1), subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., Article 60 (1) 4 (a) and Article 3 subparagraph 10 (a) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., Articles 61 (1) 4 (a) and Article 3 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and Selection of Imprisonment for the purpose of crime;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. The main sentence of Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Confiscated Narcotics;

4. It is inevitable to sentence a considerable period of time in light of the fact that the Defendant, who had been punished several times due to the same kind of crime for sentencing under the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., committed the instant crime at the same time, the amount of philopon handled by the Defendant, and the significant social harm caused by the toxicity of narcotics, etc. is high.

However, it shall be considered in favor of the fact that the defendant has mistakenly recognized and reflected, the fact that the investigation agency seems to have cooperated with the investigation of the narcotics offender, the fact that there is a family member to support, and other character, behavior, environment, etc. of the defendant.