The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized a signal breach when it comes to the first instance.

However, the defendant found a police officer's violation of signal and attempted to flee under high speed by disregarding the police officer's regular instructions, and denied the police officer's violation, and even if there were circumstances to see the police officer's violation, the defendant denied the crime up to the court below's trial and summoned the police officer as a witness to the court by denying the crime. In light of the circumstances after the crime was committed, the number of fines, etc., the court below's punishment is only within the reasonable scope of discretion, and it is difficult to see it as unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.