logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.07.05 2019고단734
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 6, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) and driven a D-hurbd-p-p-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h

2. The driver of any motor vehicle, etc. who has violated the Road Traffic Act shall not threaten or endanger other persons, or cause any danger to traffic, continuously or repeatedly, by engaging in such conduct as a violation of signal or direction, median line, speed violation, violation of the prohibition of rapid traffic, violation of prohibition of change of course, etc.;

The Defendant discovered the fact that the police officers belonging to the Yangju Police Station are under drinking control at the rear side of the E apartment in Yangsan-si, and asked the police officers to stop, and tried to escape from the control site by allowing him to be discovered of the fact of drinking driving at the control site. From the control site to the intersection of the national highways No. 47 and No. 25 to the intersection No. 13 of the national highways No. 47 and No. 25, the Defendant carried out a scam driving at the center of approximately 2K meters along with three times from the center of the central line, the police station, the prohibition of career change, and the violation of signals.

3. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle with Dhump.

On February 6, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car at around 04:0 and avoided the crackdown on drunk driving as described in paragraph (2) and was making a climatic driving, the Defendant was driving the car by moving it to the bank of G apartment at the intersection of No. 47,35 national highways to the Corporation of Yangsan-si at the intersection of No. 13. 47,35 national highways.

At the time, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents due to night, and the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, by reducing speed and checking well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this to make a bypass without reducing speed, and the Defendant left the victim H, who was in the atmosphere of signaling at the two-lanes of the opposite opposite vehicle due to the negligence of the medianing the central line.

arrow