logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.15 2018가합585979
구상금 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to KRW 2,072,047,672 and KRW 2,063,39,628 among them, Defendant A Co., Ltd., from November 9, 2018.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim is as shown in attached Form 2;

2. Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of the Acts (in the case of judgment by himself/herself, and in the case of defendant C, only a copy of the complaint of this case was served and a formal reply was presented, and no substantial written reply disputing the plaintiff's claim was submitted, and there was no appearance at the date for pleading, and therefore the plaintiff's assertion is deemed to have been

3. The Plaintiff seeking payment of damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings even for the period after June 1, 2019, and the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019). However, pursuant to Article 3(1) main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29768, May 21, 2019), the statutory interest rate of Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings was changed to 12% per annum. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim for damages for delay for the period after June 1, 2019 is without merit.

(2) Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings provides that “The statutory interest rate shall be modified by the amendment of the main sentence of Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.” Therefore, it is not reasonable for the Defendants to resist the existence or scope of the obligation to perform as to the Plaintiff’s claim. Accordingly, Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings does not apply to the burden of litigation costs

arrow