The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, although there was a knife in the Defendant’s knife at the time of the instant case, there was no knife, and there was no knife that caused the victim to knife with a knife.

B. The punishment of the lower court (one year of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in the court below's judgment as to the assertion of mistake of facts: the victim E stated in the court of the court below that "the victim E knife and knife the defendant's hand to knife by knife and knife the defendant with a knife, and knife the defendant's hand while knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife)

In addition, the fact that the defendant clearly stated that he would have made it clear that the knife would be knife by the defendant (49 pages of the trial record), and the witness F also stated in the court of original instance that "the victim was knife by the defendant."

The sound was reproduced twice.

In full view of the facts stated to the effect that the Defendant did not see and sound, etc. (the 56th page of the trial record), etc., the facts charged of this case are justified in the judgment of the court below, and there are errors in the misapprehension of facts as alleged by the Defendant, as alleged by the Defendant.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

B. Although the defendant's judgment on the unfair argument of sentencing is deemed to have disability of brain color and delay disability, and the economic situation seems to be difficult, it is deemed that the defendant denies the crime to the appellate court and did not reflect the fact that it is highly dangerous in light of the law of crime, and that he was punished for violent crimes.