A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On April 16, 2020, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 5 million from the Seoul Northern District Court to a fine of KRW 5 million due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (mediation, etc. of sexual traffic). The Defendant filed a formal trial and is currently in the first instance trial.

[Criminal facts] No person shall arrange to give or receive money, valuables or other property benefits to an unspecified person, and to interfere with similarity using part of the body, such as sexual intercourse, mouth, etc. or implements.

The defendant was a past related relationship.

B along with B (Suspension of indictment on the same day) while operating a commercial sex trafficking business establishment called “D” in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the said business establishment was discovered at the police around September 23, 2019, and the place was replaced by one another in order to continue to engage in commercial sex trafficking brokerage business with “E”, which is a new trade name, from an officetel located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

Accordingly, between September 30, 2019 and November 14, 2019, the Defendant and B opened F and G, a mobile phone number in their own name, respectively, and the Defendant leased in the name of the Defendant himself/herself or the Defendant’s pro-Japanese-dong Office Htel Nos. 1, J, K, L, and short-term lease in the name of the Defendant himself/herself or the Defendant’s pro-Japanese, and B advertised approximately 12 women to engage in sexual traffic, including N (O), P (Ga name “R,” and “S,” which are the advertising site. After receiving 170,000 won for commercial sex acts from many unspecified male customers who reported on the advertisement, the Defendant and the Defendant provided guidance to customers in each of the above officetels as the price for commercial sex acts according to the time of commercial sex acts.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with B to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each report (as to attachment of photographs) on the suspect interrogation protocol against the No. 9, U.S. No. 46 of the evidence list of the defendant's testimony in the court.