The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, misunderstanding of legal principles and misconception of the facts, the Defendant’s dump truck’s dump truck’s dump truck’s dump truck’s dump truck’s dump truck’s dump loss was caused by the victim’s negligence, not by the Defendant’s occupational negligence, but by failing to properly observe the safety rules. However, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby affecting

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (five months of imprisonment without prison labor, two years of suspended execution, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined at the lower court’s determination as to the assertion of misunderstanding the facts and legal principles, namely, ① the Defendant was driving dump trucks with the Defendant’s operation of dump trucks at around 10:0 on February 2, 2016 at the site of the installation of a bump bump boom (hereinafter “cump”). The Defendant was placed on the part of the victim’s operation (hereinafter “instant work”), and the victim was dump truck with a view to informing the Defendant of her bump truck of bump truck’s bump in order to ensure the Defendant’s bump with its reception. ② The instant work was placed on the part of the bump truck’s bump truck’s bump, which was adjusted to a bump bump bump, and the victim’s bump truck’s bump did not have a bump with the Defendant’s fault’s negligence.