logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.01.19 2016가단16473
점포인도
Text

1. Of the first floor of the building listed in the attached Table 1 List to the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B shall respectively indicate 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 of the annexed Form 2 drawings.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. At the time of September 10, 2009, Defendant B entered into a lease agreement with D, the owner of the building listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant building”) and with the 10,000,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 50,000, monthly rent of KRW 50,000, and the lease period of KRW 36 months, which connected each point of the items in the table No. 1, No. 2, No. 2, No. 3, 4, and 1 of the underground floor of the instant building.

B. Since November 21, 2012, the Plaintiff, along with E, concluded a lease agreement with D with a deposit amounting to KRW 10,000,000 for the portion of Defendant B and the instant case on the same day, monthly rent of KRW 500,00, and the rental period of KRW 12 months from November 20, 2013.

C. On September 18, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant C and the instant building with a deposit of KRW 3,000,000,000 for annual rent of KRW 7,000 for KRW 7,000 for annual rent of KRW 7,00,00,00 for KRW 12 months for the instant portion as well as KRW 10,00,00 for annual rent of KRW 650,00 for monthly rent of KRW 650,00 for rent of September 17, 2014.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff purchased E shares from E on July 2, 2014 and completed the registration of ownership transfer.

[Ground of recognition] In light of the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, 8, and 11 (including additional numbers), and the facts of the above recognition as to the ground for claim as a whole, barring special circumstances, defendant Eul is obligated to deliver each of the parts of this case to the plaintiff, since each lease contract is terminated due to the expiration of the period of November 20, 2017, and the expiration of the period of September 17, 2017.

The plaintiff has expired mainly with respect to the termination of the lease agreement.

arrow